Student Rights and Responsibilities
<b>Student Rights and Responsibilities</b> Home EOO  Academic Integrity  Public Safety  Faculty 911 
spacerspacerspacerspacer

Fundamental Principles

            Eastern Kentucky University has a long and distinguished tradition of higher education. Its students, faculty, and staff form an academic community which, while sharing certain characteristics with other types of human associations, organizations, and societies, is rightly considered unique as a community and should be governed, respected, and supported as a university community.

            Formally, Eastern Kentucky University’s purpose has been defined in part as being:

            To provide for its students those intellectual and cultural pursuits which will develop in them habits of scholarship and intellectual curiosity; which will provide for them a deep understanding of American democracy and their role in maintaining its strength and vitality; which will imbue them with an understanding of man and his aspirations: and which will enable them to communicate effectively and efficiently.

In order to promote and protect its purpose, Eastern Kentucky University has an obligation to maintain an atmosphere of academic freedom, to set and maintain standards of scholarship and conduct for students of the University, and to provide avenues for responsible student citizenship in the academic community. While the University must retain the responsibility for the structure and functioning of the academic community, it encourages constructive student advice and opinions for University improvements.

Fundamental Rights of Students

In determining the standards to be set and the manner in which sanctions shall be imposed, the University takes cognizance of certain fundamental rights, freedoms and responsibilities of students:

  1. As citizens, students enjoy the same freedoms as are guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky and have the same duties and responsibilities, as do other citizens.
  2. Admission to the University and the University’s services, facilities, and activities is open to all students without regard to race, creed, or national origin.
  3. The freedom of students to learn and to evaluate ideas and concepts is basic to the educational process and is dependent upon general conditions conducive to the learning process in the classroom, on the campus, and in the larger community. The responsibility to secure and respect such general conditions is shared by all members of the academic community.
  4. Students are free to discuss, to express opinions and to hear expression of diverse opinions. Such expression of opinions and discussion must be accomplished without disrupting operations of the University. As part of the freedom to learn, students have a right to hear the widest expression of opinion. Speakers invited to the campus offer opportunities of the presentation and examination of ideas. Such speakers represent their own points of view and not those of the University or their sponsors within the University. The freedom to hear all sides should be coupled with a responsibility to make visible the determination to examine thoroughly more than one side.
  5. Students have a right to be evaluated in courses solely on the basis of their performance in meeting appropriate academic criteria established for the course.
  6. Students are free to form and join associations with other University students provided such organizations are cognizant with the purpose of the University and conform to established University regulations and public laws. Membership in non-university organizations is assumed by the students as citizens and not as students or representatives of the University.
  7. In the administration of disciplinary measures, the accused student shall be accorded procedural fairness. In such situations, whether formal or informal, the fundamental principles of due process shall be recognized.
  8. Provisions of the Family Educational and Privacy Act of 1974 [FERPA] Public Law 93-380 are recognized.

The Basis for Standards in the University Community

Certain fundamental concepts are recognized as forming the basis for standards of conduct developed as a result of the University’s educational obligations:

  1. The academic community requires responsibility and a system of order supportive of the educational process which is the purpose of the University. Order implies non-disruptive conduct an observance of the law, a state of peace, and freedom from disorder. Disruption of the education process by a member or group of members of the community denies to all other members the pursuit of their individual educational purposes.
  2. The University community, existing within a democratic society, can be maintained only through respect for law in addition to the maintenance of and working for laws and regulations worthy of respect. Obedience to national, state and local laws and to University regulations is expected of each member of the academic community.
  3. The University welcomes into its community those who sincerely share and agree to advance its purposes. The purposes may be measured partly by the individual’s adequate preparation and respect for truth, honesty, and integrity in the university community as a whole.
  4. Ethical and moral standards, evolved in society over the centuries, are a part of the fabric of culture. The anonymity of the University community cannot free the individual or the institution from many conventional expectations relative to behavior or social relationships. Each member of the university community is expected to give consideration to the highest standards of conduct and character. No one should either offend the wider community or infringe upon the rights and privileges of others.

While the University may appear to be set aside from the larger community of which it is a part, it is created and financially supported by that larger community and has responsibilities to it. Each member of the academic community must recognize the unique relationship to the larger community. Each individual must take responsibility for his or her own actions and values and for recognizing that his or her actions and values reflect upon the University community.

Privileges and Responsibilities of the Citizens of the University Community

When becoming part of the University community, the student enjoys social, cultural, and education opportunities. He or she also assumes the role of a citizen of the community and agrees to abide by the regulations and standards of conduct operative in the University community. Much more important, his or her assuming the role of citizen of the University community implies a positive responsibility toward the well being of the entire life of that community. Responsible citizenship in the University community may be looked upon

  1. As a duty and obligation similar to the requirements of the members of any community;
  2. As an opportunity for educational growth and preparation for local, state, national, and world citizenship; and
  3. As a means of personal fulfillment, enrichment, and growth through participation in the decision-making processes in the academic community.

Responsible citizenship results from student initiative and cannot simply be decreed by the University faculty and staff, no matter how well meaning they may be. Effective campus citizenship and responsibility encompass every aspect of student life and activity. A student’s personal responsibility may be demonstrated and exercised through diligence and alertness in the academic pursuits, as well as in effective and constructive action in recognized student organizations and other co-curricular activities. Students are encouraged to exercise their right to discuss matters that concern them and to initiate changes by means of communication with appropriate members of the faculty and administrative staff. In this way students may call attention to potential problem areas and desirable changes and may contribute to the overall educational and social effectiveness of the University. Many official channels are also available for the exercising of campus citizenship. Through election by fellow students or through various processes of appointment, students are chosen to represent other students and also to present their own views in meaningful contributions to the goals, policies and governance of the University. Among the many avenues for such contribution and influence are the following:

  1. Student participation on hearing committees or the Student Court may aid in the smooth functioning of University procedures and regulations and help assure the just and fair treatment of students accused of violations. Through active Hall Councils and the Residence Life Council, students may review, recommend and help formulate policies affecting student life in the housing units.
  2. Through University student publications the student may contribute to the vital flow of information and discussion of opinion essential to a democratic society and to an effective institution of higher learning. Students serve on the staff and as editors of each others publication or may contribute material for publication. They serve on Editorial Boards and participate in making policies for the publications.
  3. The Student Government Association is the representative organization of the student body, and is comprised of the Student Senate, Student Court, Residence Life Council, and Student Activities Council.  Coordinated and led by an executive branch, SGA brings into focus the interests, concerns, and hopes of all the students in the University community, and by means of decisions and resolutions can give effective voice to the carefully considered opinions of the student community.  Its beneficial influence in the University community springs from and is enhanced by its insights into the needs and problems of students, the educational goals of the University and the University’s potential contributions to the Commonwealth.
  4. The elected president of the Student Government Association is by virtue of his/her office, a member of the Board of Regents. In this capacity he or she has the opportunity and the responsibility to represent the opinions, feelings and suggestions of the entire student body to the institutional governing board.
  5. Students serve on various official University boards and committees. Through this participation students perform an invaluable function of improving communications between the students and the University faculty and staff; they bring the opinions and concerns of the entire student community into focus on particular areas of committee responsibilities, the better to define and to achieve the goals of the University as a whole and to enrich the individual lives of all members.

Student Records

Provision of the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 Public Law 93‑380
This is to serve notice to all students of Eastern Kentucky University of the rights and restrictions regarding the maintenance, inspection, and release of student records contained in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). The University is composed of five colleges and offers a wide variety of services to students. Each college and service requires the maintenance of some records concerning students enrolled in a particular college or participating in a nonacademic service. The location and type of record maintained by the University depends upon the field of study or service in which the student is enrolled. The following is a list of the types of records maintained by the University for students.

  1. Grade reports
  2. Transcripts
  3. Curriculum information
  4. Applications for Graduation
  5. Correspondence with students, if any
  6. Withdrawal records, if applicable
  7. Admission forms
  8. ACT scores
  9. Student teacher evaluations, if applicable
  10. Letters of recommendation, if applicable
  11. Nominations for awards, if applicable
  12. Biographical data
  13. Evaluation forms, if applicable
  14. Weekly student teacher logs, if applicable
  15. Midterm evaluation, if applicable
  16. Records of school visitations, if applicable
  17. Physical Education requirement waivers
  18. Field training evaluations and correspondence, if applicable
  19. Professional conduct agreements and liability insurance coverage
  20. Disciplinary Records, if applicable

Access to Records

In general, the records maintained by the University are available only to the student, to University personnel with legitimate educationa; interests, to other institutions where the student is seeking financial aid, and to authorized representatives of the Comptroller General of the U.S., the Secretary of Education or and administrative head of an education agency, in connection with an audit or evaluation of federal supported programs, and as provided by Section 164.283 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes. However, information may be released by the institution to appropriate persons in connection with an emergency if the knowledge of such information is necessary to protect the health or safety of a student or other persons. Records may also be furnished in compliance with a judicial order or pursuant to a subpoena or with the consent of the student.

Students may inspect and review all records pertaining to them within forty-five (45) days of making request for same, except for (1) records created or maintained by a physician, psychiatrist, psychologist or other recognized professional or paraprofessional acting or assisting in a professional capacity in connection with treatment of the student (except that the student may have these records reviewed by a physician or appropriate professional designated by the student), (2) financial records of the student’s parents, (3) confidential letters and recommendations put in the files prior to January 1, 1975, and (4) confidential recommendations relations to admission, applications for employment, or honors, if the student has waived his right to review such records. Where a particular record cannot be reviewed by a student without revealing confidential information relating to other students, the records custodian will inform the student, upon request, of the contents of the records pertaining to that student.

Parents of dependent students have a right to information concerning their children’s grades without having to gain the student’s consent.

Directory Information

The University may release information without the student’s consent where the information is classified as “directory information.” The following categories of information have been designated by the University as directory information: name, address, telephone listing, e-mail address, date and place of birth, major field of study, participation in officially recognized activities and sports, weight and height of members of athletic teams, dates of attendance, degrees and awards received, and the most recent previous education institution attended by the student. Students who do not wish such information released without their consent should notify the Registrar’s Office in writing. Any such request should be sent to Office of the Registrar; Eastern Kentucky University; Student Services Building; SSB CPO 58; 521 Lancaster Avenue; Richmond, Kentucky 40475-3158.

Parental Notification

In 1998, FERPA was amended to permit institutions of higher education to disclose to a parent or legal guardian of a student information regarding any violation of any federal, state, or local law, or of any rule or policy of the institution, governing the use of possession of alcohol or a controlled substance, regardless of whether that information is contained in the student’s record, if:

  1. The student is under the age of 21; and
  2. The institution determines that the student has committed a disciplinary violation with respect to such use or possession.

This is to serve notice to all students that Eastern Kentucky University will notify and disclose to a parent/s, or legal guardian* of a student who is under the age of  21 information regarding the violation of the following paragraphs of the General Regulations Concerning Student Behavior as set forth in the University Handbook for Students.

  1. Paragraph 5 – Illegally selling, possessing, possessing paraphernalia or using drugs or other substances.*
  2. Paragraph 6 – Engaging in drunk and disorderly conduct on University owned or controlled property or in University functions.*
  3. Paragraph 7 – Being under the influence of alcohol to the degree that the student may endanger himself/herself or other persons or property.*
  4. Paragraph 8 – Possessing or consuming alcoholic beverages on University property.*

    * Students have the right to appeal parental notification to the Associate Provost/Vice President for Student Affairs.

Notification of Rights under FERPA for Postsecondary Institutions

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act afford students certain rights with respect to their education records. They are:

  1. The right to inspect and review the student’s education records within 45 days of the day the University receives a request for access. Students should submit to the registrar, dean, head of the academic department, or other appropriate official, written requests that identify the record(s) they wish to inspect.
    The University official will make arrangements for access and notify the student of the time and place where the records may be inspected. If the records are not maintained by the University official to whom the request was submitted, that official shall advice the student of the correct official to whom the request should be addressed.
  2. The right to request the amendment of the student’s education records that the student believes is inaccurate or misleading.
    Students may ask the University to amend a record that they believe is inaccurate or misleading. They should write the University official responsible for the record, clearly identify the part of the record they want changed, and specify why it is inaccurate or misleading.
    If the university decides not to amend the record as requested by the student, the University will notify the student of the decision and advise the student of his or her right to a hearing regarding the request for amendment. Additional information regarding the hearing procedures will be provided to the student when notified of the right to a hearing.
  3. The right to consent to disclosures of personally identifiable information contained in the student’s education records, except to the extent that FERPA authorizes and disclosure without consent.
    One exception which permits disclosure without consent is disclosure to school officials with legitimate educational interests. A school official is a person employed by the University in an administrative, supervisory, academic or research, or support staff position (including law enforcement unit personnel and health staff); a person or company with whom the University has contracted (such as an attorney, auditor, or collection agent); a person serving on the Board of Trustees; or a student serving on an official committee, such as a disciplinary or grievance committee, or assisting another school official in performing his or her tasks.
    A school official has a legitimate education interest if the official needs to review an education record in order to fulfill his or her professional responsibility.
    Upon request, the University discloses education records without consent to officials of another school in which the student seeks or intends to enroll.
  4. The right to file a complaint with the U.S Department of Education concerning allege failures by the University to comply with the requirements of FERPA. The name and address of the Office that administers FERPA are:

    Family Policy Compliance Office
    U.S. Department of Education
    400 Maryland Avenue
    Washington, DC 20202-4605

Procedures for Challenge

A student who believes that any record maintained by the University pertaining directly to that student is inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise violative of the right of privacy of the student as provided by Title IV of Pub.L. 90‑247, as amended and Pub. L. 93‑380, as amended by Senate Joint Resolution 40 (1974) may request a hearing before a panel of three persons appointed by the President of the University. The panel may direct that appropriate action be taken to correct, explain, or expunge the record(s) challenged.

Request for hearings should be addressed to the Office of University Counsel; Eastern Kentucky University; Coates Room 205; CPO 40A; 521 Lancaster Avenue; Richmond, Kentucky 40475-3102.

General Regulations Concerning Student Behavior

Part 1: Offenses

Students are responsible for knowing the University’s regulations, disciplinary procedures, and penalties. It should be emphasized that students are subject to criminal statutes and legal action, not just the University’s regulations and disciplinary system.

  1. Endangering or threatening to endanger life, health, safety or property.
  2. Subjecting another person to sexual intercourse or sexual contact by forcible compulsion or while the person is incapable of consent.
  3. Engaging in a course of conduct which is intended to harass, seriously annoy or alarm another person.
  4. Persons are prohibited from possessing pellet gun, BB guns and firearms, explosives, or other deadly weapons or look-alike or replica weapons on the campus of Eastern Kentucky University, except as follows:
    1. Sworn police officers employed by the University’s Division of Public Safety;
    2. Sworn police officers employed by other public agencies and present on the campus for the purposes of education, training, or assistance at University events; when such possession may be necessary for their official duties or for participation in training. Such officers must be authorized by the employing agency to carry weapons as a normal and required part of their duties;
    3. Members of the U.S. Army Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) when necessary for the purposes of military officer education and marksmanship training.
  5. Illegally selling, possessing, possessing paraphernalia or using drugs or other substances.
  6. Engaging in drunk and disorderly conduct on University owned or controlled property or at University functions.
  7. Being under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance to the degree that the student may endanger himself/herself or other persons or property.
  8. Possessing or consuming alcohol or controlled substances on University property.
  9. Taking, possessing, damaging or destroying public or private property.
  10. Creating a fire or safety hazard or abusing/misusing safety equipment, or transmitting false fire alarms; helping or influencing others in such offenses.
  11. Vandalizing, damaging, abusing, or interfering with the operation of elevators.
  12. Throwing objects from University buildings.
  13. Disrupting the peace or interfering with classroom or other University activities.
  14. Disregarding the reasonable directives, verbal or written, of any staff in the conduct of assigned duties.
  15. Unauthorized entry to or unauthorized use of any University property of facilities; this includes, but is not limited to the violation of residence hall regulations, for example:
    1. Failing to comply with visitation regulations;
    2. Failing to comply with residence hall regulations as listed in the residence hall guidelines and/or the housing contract;
  16. Falsifying identity or information.
  17. Academic dishonesty; plagiarism, cheating and fabrication.
  18. Offering or passing a worthless check or failing to meet financial obligations to the University.
  19. Interfering with the use of or abusing any part of University computing services or facilities.
  20. Violating University regulations for operating motor vehicles.
  21. Encouraging or helping someone to violate University regulations.
  22. Failing to abide by the terms of any disciplinary sanction properly imposed by a University official, committee, or agency.
  23. Failure to self-report as a registered sex offender or any other violation of the “University Policy Regarding employees and Students Registered as Sex Offenders.”

Part 2: Sanctions

            The University has the authority to penalize or impose sanctions on students who violate University regulations.  In determining possible sanctions, the University shall consider such matters as the nature of the particular offense, the welfare of the student and the University community, and the prior disciplinary record of the student.  Usual sanctions are listed and explained in this section.  In addition to these sanctions, other sanctions, as appropriate for a particular case, may be imposed.  Each level of hearing body may use creative educational sanctions that are designed to be developmental in nature.

Reprimand

Official written or oral statement to the student that he or she is guilty of violating a University regulation. A reprimand warns that any further such actions may result in a more severe sanction.

Restitution

Compensation to the University or an individual for damages to University property or personal property.

Social Probation

Status given to less serious policy violations, and in some cases, a restriction of privileges for a specified time.

University Service

Mandated service to the University of up to 16 hours to be completed within a specified time frame.

Educational Sanction

Developmental sanction requiring attendance or participation in a prearranged class, program or activity designed to prevent or deal with high risk behavior.

Counseling

A student may be referred to the Counseling Center for a counseling evaluation with prior arrangement of the Counseling Center.

Parental Notification

A written sanction that notifies and discloses to a parent, parents or legal guardian of a student who is under the age of 21, information regarding the violation of University regulations governing the use of possession of alcohol of a controlled substance. *Students have the right to appeal parental notification to the Associate Provost/Vice President for Student Affairs.

Loss of Visitation Privileges

Period of time where a student loses all visitation privileges. During loss of visitation privileges the student is not allowed to check visitors into his or her residence hall, and they are not allowed to be checked into the residence hall of another student. The guidelines for sanctioning visitation violations are as follows:

First Offense: Two week loss of visitation and verbal reprimand.
Second Offense: Two month loss of visitation privileges and written reprimand.
Third Offense:  One semester loss of visitation privileges.

Administrative Assessment

Pecuniary sanction of up to $2000 to be paid to the University.

Eviction

Forced removal from University Housing, a classroom or other University property.

University Probation

Status which carries a severe warning that any further violation of university regulations may result in the student going before the Student Disciplinary Council for consideration of suspension or expulsion. This may include restriction of privileges for a specified period of time.

Suspension

Forced withdrawal from the University for a specific period of time or until stated conditions have been met as determined by the Student Disciplinary Council.

Expulsion

Permanent, forced withdrawal from the University as determined by the Student Disciplinary Council.

Part 3: Standard Sanctions Controlled Substances/Alcohol

Paragraph 6: Engaging in drunk and disorderly conduct on University owned or controlled property.

First Offense

  • One semester of University probation
  • Completion of alcohol program #1
  • Unannounced room inspections during probation
  • $100 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand

Second Offense

  • One year of University probation
  • Completion of alcohol/drug assessment
  • Unannounced room inspections during probation
  • $200 administrative assessment
  • Parental notification
  • Written reprimand

Subsequent Offenses

  • One year of University probation
  • Eviction from University Housing
  • Student is prohibited from being on the premises of any University Housing
  • University service
  • $675 administrative assessment
  • Parental notification
  • Alcohol/drug assessment, at cost to the student, from a certified chemical dependency counselor, and a requirement that the student must follow-up with the recommendations of that psychological evaluation
  • Written reprimand to include a warning of suspension or expulsion

Paragraph 7: Being under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances to the degree that the student may be a danger to himself or other persons or property.

First Offense

  • One semester of University probation
  • Completion of alcohol program #1
  • Unannounced room inspections during probation
  • $100 administrative assessment
  • Parental notification
  • Completion of alcohol/drug assessment
  • Written reprimand

Subsequent Offenses

  • One year of University probation
  • Eviction from University Housing
  • Student is prohibited from being on the premise of any University Housing
  • University service
  • $675 administrative assessment
  • Parental notification
  • Alcohol/drug assessment, at cost to the student, from a certified counselor, and a requirement that the student must follow-up with the recommendations of that psychological evaluation
  • Written reprimand to include a warning of suspension or expulsion

Paragraph 8: Possessing or consuming alcohol or controlled substances on university property.

First Offense

  • One semester of social probation
  • Completion of alcohol program #1
  • Unannounced room inspections during probation
  • Written reprimand

Second Offense

  • One semester of University probation
  • Unannounced room inspections during probation
  • $50 administrative assessment
  • Parental notification
  • Written reprimand

Third Offense

  • One semester of University probation
  • Completion of alcohol/drug assessment
  • Unannounced room inspections during probation
  • $100 administrative assessment
  • Parental notification
  • Written reprimand

Subsequent Offenses

  • One year of University probation
  • Eviction from University Housing
  • Student is prohibited from being on the premises of any University Housing
  • University service
  • $675 administrative assessment
  • Parental notification
  • Alcohol/drug assessment, at cost to the student, from a certified chemical dependency counselor, and a requirement that the student must follow-up with the recommendations of that psychological evaluation
  • Written reprimand to include a warning of suspension or expulsion

Part 5: Standard Sanctions: Fire/Safety Violations and Smoking Policy Violations

Fire/Safety Violations

Paragraph 10: University Handbook for Students, creating a fire or safety hazard or abusing/misusing safety equipment, or transmitting false fire alarms; helping or influencing others in such violations.

1st Offense

  • One semester of social probation
  • Attendance to the Fire Safety Class
  • Failure to attend class will result in a $50 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in University probation and a $100 administrative assessment

2nd Offense

  • One semester of University probation
  • $100 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in one year of University probation, University service, eviction from University Housing and $675 administrative assessment

3rd Offense

  • One year of University probation
  • University service
  • Eviction from University Housing
  • $675 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in consideration of suspension or expulsion

Smoking Violations

1st offense

  • Verbal reprimand

2nd offense

  • Written reprimand

3rd Offense

  • One semester of social probation
  • $50 administrative assessment
  • Attendance to the Fire Safety Class
  • Failure to attend class will result in a $50 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in a semester of University probation, $100 administrative assessment and University service

4th Offense

  • One semester of University probation
  • $100 administrative assessment
  • University service
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in consideration of  suspension or expulsion

Part 5: Standard Sanctions: Computer Violations

Computer Violations

 1st Offense

  • One semester of social probation
  • $100 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in University probation and a $250 administrative assessment

          2nd Offense

  • One semester of University probation
  • $250 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in a $500 administrative assessment

          3rd Offense

  • One year of University probation
  • $500 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in a $1000 administrative assessment

          
Subsequent Offenses

  • One year of University probation
  • $1000 administrative assessment
  • Written reprimand that any further violations may result in consideration of suspension or expulsion

Part 6: Procedures in Student Conduct Cases

The University will use the disciplinary authority inherent in its responsibilities to protect its educational purposes and processes. In the exercise of this authority, safeguards shall be observed to insure due process to a student accused of violations of General Regulations Concerning Student Behavior. The term “student” includes all persons taking courses at Eastern Kentucky University, both full time and part time, pursuing undergraduate, graduate, or professional studies and those who attend postsecondary educational institutions other than EKU and who reside in University Housing. Persons who are not enrolled for a particular term but who have a continuing relationship with EKU are considered students. Individuals who are not students but reside in University Housing are subject to University disciplinary regulations. The General Regulations Concerning Students Behavior are defined as written regulations of EKU as found in, but not limited to, the University Handbook for Students, Residence Life Handbook and University web page, www.eku.edu. These particular regulations may be referred to as University disciplinary regulations or as the student code of conduct.

Generally, the University’s jurisdiction for application of the General Regulations Concerning Student Behavior shall be limited to conduct which occurs on University premises or which adversely affects the University Community and its pursuit of its objectives. The term “University premises” includes all land, buildings, facilities, and other property in the possessing of or owned, used, or controlled by Eastern Kentucky University including adjacent streets or sidewalks. The University does not act as a collection agency for landlords, retails stores or others. Proceedings under this student code of conduct may be carried out prior to, simultaneously with, or following civil or criminal proceedings off campus.

The University disciplinary system is composed of three levels. The three levels are Residence Hall Coordinators and Student Judicial Committees, Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities and the Student Disciplinary Council. The term “student judicial committees” means any person or persons authorized by the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities to determine if a student has violated the student conduct code and to recommend imposition of sanctions. The Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities is that person designated by the President of Eastern Kentucky University to be responsible for the administration of the student disciplinary system. The Student Disciplinary Council is that entity which is designated by the Board of Regents, pursuant to K.R.S. 164.370, to hear those cases in which the gravity of the charge suggests a possible sanction of suspension or expulsion. In each instance, the formality of procedures followed in hearing cases will vary with the gravity of the sanction or penalty suggested by the alleged violation of University Regulations. In all cases, the burden of proof shall be on the accuser.

Any member of the Eastern Kentucky University community may file charges against any student for misconduct. The term “member of the University community” includes any student or person employed by Eastern Kentucky University. Charges shall be prepared in writing, as soon as possible after the event takes place, and directed to the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities who is responsible for the administration of the University’s judicial system.

Penalties or sanctions imposed by any of the University officials or hearing entities responsible for the enforcement of University regulations shall bear a reasonable relation to the nature of the violation of University regulations for which the penalty is imposed. A student’s status in the University, including his right to remain on campus and to attend classes, shall remain unaltered while the charges for violating University regulations are pending.

Except that, in the event that a student is accused of a violation against the University and/or against the city, state, or federal government, the nature of which may present a clear and present danger of harm to the student, to any other member of the University community, to University property, or to University activities, the President may impose such temporary measures as are necessary to protect the student, the University Community, University property, and/or the ongoing activities of the University. Such temporary sanctions may exist and be enforced only until final disposition of the case has been made by the appropriate University official, or hearing entity but not to exceed a period of five class days. Temporary sanctions based on the “clear and present danger” principle may, upon recommendation of the Student Disciplinary Council and approval of the President be continued during the period of appeal to the Student Discipline Appeals Committee of the Board of Regents. In all cases, students accused of violating University regulations will be informed of their rights, including avenues for appeal of a decision and the right not to testify against oneself.

The Executive Director or an appropriate staff member shall counsel the student concerning their alleged violation of the General Regulations Concerning Student Behavior, right to a hearing and an appeal. The Executive Director or appropriate staff member may conduct an investigation to determine if the charges have merit and/or if they can be disposed of administratively by mutual consent of the involved parties. Such agreed dispositions shall be final and there shall be no right of appeal. If the charges cannot be disposed of by mutual consent, the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities or their designee may later serve in the same matter as a hearing officer. All charges shall be presented to the accused student in written form. If the student requests a hearing, there shall be a single record of all hearings before the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities or the Student Disciplinary Council. The record shall be the property of Eastern Kentucky University. Hearings shall be conducted in private in compliance with FERPA, and decisions at hearings are final dispositions. The accused student has the right to be assisted by an advisor of their choice who is a member of the Eastern Kentucky University community. The accused student is responsible for presenting their case and, therefore, advisors are not permitted to speak in any hearing before a judicial body.

When the violation is one that indicates possible suspension or expulsion, the student may elect to withdraw from the institution without appearing before the Student Disciplinary Council. The student shall sign a statement indicating that they have been advised of their rights to a hearing and an appeal but intend instead to withdraw from the University on their own accord. In each case in which the gravity of the charges suggests suspension or expulsion, and the student does not elect to withdraw, the case must be heard by the Student Disciplinary Council.

Part 7: Hearing Bodies

Provision has been made for certain committees or bodies to hear cases involving the alleged infraction of University regulations and appeals of decisions evolving from these cases. The organizational structure of these bodies is as follows:

  • Board of Regents
  • President of the University
  • Student Disciplinary Council
  • Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities
  • Judicial Committee


President

            The President of the University is the executive officer of the Board of Regents. In this capacity, the President brings to the attention of the Board matters for the Board’s consideration.

Board of Regents

            KRS 164.310 provides for a Board of Regents for state universities and KRS 164.350 provides that the government of the University is vested in its Board of Regents. The statute provides, further, that:
Each Board of Regents, when its members have been appointed and qualified, shall constitute a body corporate, with the usual corporate powers, and with all immunities, rights, privileges and franchises usually attaching to the governing bodies of education institutions.

Student Disciplinary Council

            Kentucky Revised Statute 164.370 provides that:

Each Board of Regents may invest the faculty or a committee of the faculty and students with the power to suspend or expel any student for disobedience to its rules, or for any other contumacy, insubordination, or immoral conduct.  In every case of suspension or expulsion of a student the person suspended or expelled may appeal to the Board of Regents.  The Board of Regents shall prescribe the manner and the mode of procedure on appeal.  The decision of the Board of Regents shall be final.

By prior action, the Board of Regents has invested the Student Disciplinary Council with the power to suspend or expel a student and this hearing body has original and exclusive jurisdiction in those cases where the suspension or expulsion of a student is a considered sanction for the infraction of which the student is accused. This hearing body shall consist of five faculty members and two student members named by the President of the University. The Associate Provost/Vice President for Student Affairs and the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities shall not be members of this Board in matters relating to student conduct. In addition to suspension or expulsion, the Student Disciplinary Council may impose University Service probation, assessment or reprimand as sanctions for disciplinary cases. An appeal of a decision of the Student Disciplinary Council by a suspended or expelled student may be made, through the Associate Provost/Vice President for Student Affairs, to the President of the University, to the Board of Regents.

Charges of misconduct, preliminary to disciplinary action shall be presented to the student in writing. Charges shall be of sufficient specificity and provide for a reasonable amount of time to permit defense preparation prior to a possible hearing. The Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities shall, on the basis of the gravity of the charge(s) placed against the student, designate the appropriate committee or agency to hear the case, except that, in cases where suspension or expulsion is a considered sanction, the case shall be brought before the Student Disciplinary Council.

In presenting a defense before a hearing or review committee, the student may be advised by (1) a member of the University student body if the committee is composed primarily of students or (2) any member of the University community if the hearing is before the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities or a committee composed primarily of University faculty or staff. He or she may choose an advisor, but no person shall be obligated to serve in this capacity.

In the hearing of charges against the student, the burden of proof is on the representative of the University or the individual presenting the charges. In addition to the right of advisement, the student has the right to testify in his or her own behalf, to present evidence and witnesses, to hear and question adverse witnesses, to rebut unfavorable inferences, to present two character witnesses and the right to an appeal as set forth herein. The student shall be informed of all the statements and evidence submitted against him or her and the names of those providing the evidence. Decision of the hearing committee is to be based solely on evidence submitted in the hearing, and improperly acquired evidence should not be admitted.

In cases involving suspension or expulsion, a record shall be made of the hearing, maintained in the files of the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities, and a copy shall be made available for inspection by the accused and his or her advisor, with the accused student’s written permission.

Hearing Agency of Computer Violations

Faculty members, staff, and students may refer violators to the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities for disciplinary action. Because of the technical nature of computer violations, the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities may refer cases of alleged infractions to the Director of Information Technology, who will report findings and recommendations directly to the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities.

Part 8: Appeal of Disciplinary Sanctions

A student has the right to appeal the imposition of a penalty or sanction. An appeal may be made only on justifiable grounds including irregularity in proceedings, punishment inconsistent with the nature of the violation or additional pertinent information not available for the original hearing. Such appeal should be directed to the level immediately above that which originally heard the case.

  1. Student Judicial Committees appeal is to the Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities, in writing, within five class days following the decision.
  2. Executive Director of Student Rights and Responsibilities appeal is to the Associate Provost/Vice President for Student Affairs, in writing, within five class days following the decision.
  3. Student Disciplinary Council Appeal is to the Associate Provost/Vice President for Student Affairs, in writing, within five class days following the decision. If the Associate Provost/Vice President upholds the sanction of suspension or expulsion, an appeal may be made to the President of the University, in writing, within five class days after receipt of the Associate Provost/Vice President’s decision. The President may, upon reviewing the basis for the student appeal, set aside the applied sanction, refer the case back to the Student Disciplinary Council, or uphold the decision, which in effect refers the appeal to the Student Disciplinary Appeals Committee of the Board of Regents. However, if the President does not take action within five class days after receipt, it is automatically referred to the Student Disciplinary Appeals Committee of the Board of Regents.
  4. Parental Notification: An appeal of the sanction of parental notification is to the Associate Provost/Vice President for Student Affairs, in writing, within five class days following the imposition of sanction. Appeal of the sanction of Parental Notification may be made on the following grounds: 1) The student is independent; and/or 2) Extenuating circumstances which indicate that Parental Notification is inappropriate.

Part 9: Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure

EKU Academic Integrity Policy
(EKU Honor Code and Pledge)

Preamble

Eastern Kentucky University is a community of shared academic values, foremost of which is a strong commitment to intellectual honesty, honorable conduct, and respect for others. In order to meet these values, students at Eastern Kentucky University are expected to adhere to the highest standards of academic integrity. These standards are embodied in the Eastern Kentucky University Academic Integrity Policy, which all students shall pledge to uphold by signing the Eastern Kentucky University Honor Code. By honoring and enforcing this Academic Integrity Policy, the University community affirms that it will not tolerate academic dishonesty.

Academic Dishonesty Defined

Academic integrity is a fundamental value for the Eastern Kentucky University community of students, faculty, and staff. It should be clearly understood that academic dishonesty is not tolerated and incidents of it will have serious consequences. Anyone who knowingly assists in any form of academic dishonesty shall be considered as responsible as the student who accepts such assistance and shall be subject to the same sanctions. Academic dishonesty can occur in different forms, some of which include cheating, plagiarism, and fabrication.

Cheating

Cheating is an act or an attempted act of deception by which a student seeks to misrepresent that he/she has mastered information on an academic exercise. Cheating includes, but is not limited to:

  • Giving or receiving assistance not authorized by the instructor or University representative;
  • Participating in unauthorized collaboration on an academic exercise;
  • Using unapproved or misusing electronic devices or aids during an academic exercise.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism occurs when a student represents work taken from another source as his/her own. It is imperative that a student gives credit to information, words, ideas, and images that are integrated into his/her own work. Acknowledgement of a source of information in any form should consist of complete, accurate, and specific references and, if verbatim statements are included, quotation marks as well. Examples of plagiarism include, but are not limited to:

  • Using words, ideas, or images from another source (including the Internet); whether in quotation marks or not, without giving credit to that source in the form of a bibliographic citation;
  • Facts, statistics, or other supporting materials that are not clearly common knowledge without acknowledgment of the source.

Fabrication

Fabrication is a form of deception and occurs when a student misrepresents written or verbal information in an academic exercise. Fabrication includes, but is not limited to:

  • Citation of information not taken from the source indicated. This may include the incorrect documentation of secondary source materials;
  • Listing sources in a bibliography not directly used in the academic exercise;
  • Submission in a paper, thesis, lab report, practicum log, or other academic exercise of falsified, invented, or fictitious data or evidence, or deliberate and knowing concealment or distortion of the true nature, origin, or function of such data or evidence;
  • Submitting as your own any academic exercise (verbal, written, electronic, or artistic work) prepared totally or in part by another person.

Pledge:  The following is the pledge of EKU Students

I hereby affirm that I understand, accept, and will uphold the responsibilities and stipulations of the Eastern Kentucky University Honor Code and Academic Integrity Policy.

Procedures for Dealing with Academic Integrity Cases

Step 1 - When a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy is suspected:

If an incident of alleged violation of the AI Policy is suspected, any member of the EKU community can initiate the process of review by reporting the incident, in writing, directly to the responsible faculty/staff. The responsible faculty/staff may elect to conduct his/her own review of the allegations or may elect for the matter to be referred to the Academic Integrity Office.

     Option A: The Faculty/Staff Member Conducts a Review of the Allegations:

If the responsible faculty/staff chooses to continue the review of the allegations autonomously, the faculty/staff should obtain and assess the applicable information in determining whether a violation of the AI policy has occurred. If the faculty/staff member determines that an AI policy violation has occurred, a notification of the violation must be made to the Office of Academic Integrity for recordkeeping. At this point, the faculty/staff also notifies the student in writing of the allegation, the sanction, AND the right to contest the allegation and sanction according to the AI Policy procedure. If the student accepts responsibility for the violation and the sanction in writing, the case is closed. There is no appeal from this decision. Upon determination of responsibility, the Assistant Director of AI will enter the reported data in the database. If the student does not accept responsibility and chooses to contest the allegation and/or sanction, the process proceeds to Step 2. Note: The faculty/staff involved in Step 1 should request information from the Assistant Director of AI regarding the student’s previous violations of the AI Policy prior to rendering a sanction in this particular case.

    Option B: The Faculty/Staff Member Refers the Case to the Academic Integrity Office:

If a faculty/staff chooses to directly refer the case to the AI Office, the Assistant Director of AI will meet with the student to discuss the alleged violation. If the student chooses not to contest the allegation and sanction, the sanction is imposed and the case is closed. There is no appeal from this decision. Notification of the violation is made by the AI Office for recordkeeping. If the student contests the allegation and/or sanction, the AI Office will schedule a hearing, as soon as practicable, with the specific College Academic Integrity Committee from which the incident occurred. (Then proceed on to Step 3.)

Step 2 - When an Academic Integrity Charge or Sanction is contested:

After the faculty/staff and student have met and the student chooses to contest the charge and/or sanction, the faculty/staff will refer the case to the AI Office, within 5 academic days of the meeting. The Assistant Director of AI will meet with the student to discuss the charge and/or sanctions and the right to contest these. If the student chooses not to contest the charge and sanction, the case is closed. There is no appeal from this decision. Notification of the violation is made by the AI Office for recordkeeping. If the student contests the allegation and/or sanction, the AI Office will schedule a hearing, as soon as practicable, with the specific College Academic Integrity Committee from which the incident occurred. (Then proceed on to Step 3.)

Step 3

At the College Academic Integrity Committee hearing, both the student and the faculty/staff will present their information. The Committee members will review all of the information presented and then deliberate in private. At the discretion of the Chair of the Committee, the proceeding may be extended to an additional meeting. At this level of hearing and continuing throughout the process, the student has the option of having a Peer Advisor present. Absent exceptional circumstances beyond the control of the student as determined by the Chair of the Committee, if the student who has been notified of the hearing fails to appear, the proceeding may take place in his/her absence and the Committee’s decision will be binding. If the Committee determines that the student has violated the AI Policy, before the sanctioning stage of the hearing, the Assistant Director of AI will provide the Committee information regarding whether the student has any previous AI Policy violations recorded and sanctions imposed. The Committee will deliberate again in private in order to determine the appropriate sanction for this violation. The Chair will announce the decision of the Committee to those present at the conclusion of the hearing.

Step 4

A student can appeal the decision of the College Academic Integrity Committee to the University Academic Integrity Committee. This appeal can only be made based upon irregularities in procedure, new evidence not available for the first hearing, or punishment not consistent with the violation. The student will notify, in writing, the AI Office of their request to appeal to the University Academic Integrity Committee within 5 academic days of the College Academic Integrity Committee’s decision, and a meeting of the University Academic Integrity Committee will be scheduled as soon as practicable.

Step 5

At the University Academic Integrity Committee appeal review meeting, the Committee members will consider all the written information supplied by the student. The Committee can modify or set aside the applied sanction, refer the case back to the College Academic Integrity Committee, or uphold the decision. The Chair of the Committee will notify the student of its decision, in writing, within 5 academic days of the hearing. The decision of the University Academic Integrity Committee is final, unless the Committee determines suspension or expulsion is the appropriate sanction to be imposed.

Step 6 through Step 9

The following steps will ONLY be necessary if it is determined that the student may face the sanctions of suspension or expulsion for the alleged AI Policy violation. According to KRS 164.370, Eastern Kentucky University’s Student Disciplinary Council is the only body authorized to suspend or expel a student.
KRS 164.370 provides that: “Each Board of Regents may invest the faculty or a committee of the faculty and students with the power to suspend or expel any student for disobedience to its rules, or for any other contumacy, insubordination, or immoral conduct. In every case of suspension or expulsion of a student the person suspended or expelled may appeal to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents shall prescribe the manner and the mode of procedure on appeal. The decision of the Board of Regents shall be final.”

Step 6

If the College Academic Integrity Committee or University Academic Integrity Committee or Assistant Director of AI determines that the sanction of expulsion or suspension is appropriate for the AI Policy violation and the student wishes to appeal the sanction, the student must notify, in writing, the AI Office, within 5 academic days of the decision of the College or University Academic Integrity Committee’s decision, of his/her desire to appeal. As soon as practicable, the AI Office will schedule a hearing before the Student Disciplinary Council.

Step 7

At the Student Disciplinary Council hearing, both the student and the faculty/staff will present their information. The Council will review all of the information presented and then deliberate in private. At the discretion of the Chair of the Student Disciplinary Council, the proceeding may be extended to an additional meeting. Absent exceptional circumstances beyond the control of the student as determined by the Chair of the Council, if the student who has been notified of the hearing fails to appear, the proceeding may take place in his/her absence and the Committee’s decision will be binding. If the Council determines that the student has violated the AI Policy, before the sanctioning stage of the meeting, the Assistant Director of AI will provide the Council information regarding whether the student has any previous AI Policy violations recorded and sanctions imposed. The Council will deliberate again in private in order to determine the appropriate sanction for this violation. The Chair will announce the decision of the Council to those present at the conclusion of the hearing.

Step 8

If the student chooses to contest the allegation and/or sanction, the student can appeal to the Provost. The student will notify, in writing, the AI Office of his/her request and grounds for such request, within 5 class days of the Student Disciplinary Council’s decision. An appeal to the Provost can only be based upon irregularities in procedure, new evidence not available for the first hearing, or punishment not consistent with the violation. The Provost will render a decision, in writing, within 10 academic days of receipt of the appeal.

Step 9

If the Provost upholds the decision of the Student Disciplinary Council, and if the student chooses to contest the allegation and/or sanction, the student can appeal to the Board of Regents. The student will notify, in writing, the AI Office of his/her request and the grounds for such request, within 5 academic days of the Provost’s decision. An appeal to the Board of Regents can only be based upon irregularities in procedure, new evidence not available at the first hearing, or punishment not consistent with the violation. The decision of the Board of Regents is final.

Academic Integrity Sanctions

Minimum Sanction:
The standard minimum sanction for an AI Policy violation shall be the assignment of an “F” for the test, assignment, activity in which an incident of academic dishonesty occurred. The student will not be allowed to retake or rewrite the test, assignment, or activity. A student so assigned an “F” will not be permitted to drop or withdraw from the course.

Minimum Sanction for student with one previous Academic Integrity Policy violation:
The standard minimum sanction for an AI Policy violation for a student with one previous AI Policy violation will be an “FX” recorded for the course on the student’s transcript. The “FX” grade denotes failure in the course due to academic dishonesty. A student so assigned an “FX” for a course will not be permitted to drop or withdraw from the course.

Sanctions:
In addition to the minimum sanctions for an AI Policy violation, other appropriate educational sanctions may be assigned. These sanctions may be given even if this is the first violation of the AI Policy. Such sanctions could include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Removal from the course
  • Educational sanctions
  • Community service
  • Restriction of computer access
  • Precluded from graduating with Honors
  • Assigned an "F" for the course
  • “FX" notation on transcript
  • Suspension*
  • Expulsion*

* Note: According to KRS 164.370, Eastern Kentucky University’s Student Disciplinary Council is the only body authorized to suspend or expel a student, Steps 6 through Step 9.

"FX" Notation:

The “FX” grade will be changed to an “F” on the student’s transcript upon completion of the educational sanctions so specified by the faculty/staff (Step 1) or other hearing bodies. A course with a grade of “FX” may not be repeated until the “FX”grade is changed to an “F”. The student can then choose to repeat the course with the grade earned in the later taking replacing that of the “F” grade.

Helpful Definitions

Scheduling of Hearings:
Hearings will be scheduled as soon as practicable after the Assistant Director of AI receives written notification of the charge of an Academic Integrity violation.

Triviality:
A case may be dismissed if it is found to be trivial. A trivial case is one with no possible consequences to a matter of legitimate concern of the academic community or one with no tendency to undermine trust within the community.

Assistant Director:
The Assistant Director of AI is a faculty member who coordinates the EKU Academic Integrity Policy and procedure. The Assistant Director of AI does not take part in any actual hearings, but is available to answer procedural questions. The Assistant Director of AI is responsible for maintaining all records of all incidents involving the EKU Academic Integrity Policy.

College Academic Integrity Committee:
The College Academic Integrity Committee is comprised of 5 members (1 faculty from the department where the incident arose, 2 faculty from the college at large, and 2 students from the college at large but not from the department where the incident arose.) If this case involves a graduate student, at least one of the students on the Committee will be a graduate student. One member, elected by the Committee, will serve as Chair. The Committee is responsible for determining the facts, and, if the student is found to have violated the AI Policy, the Committee must determine the appropriate sanction. To determine that a violation has/has not has occurred, 4 of the 5 Committee members must agree. To determine the sanction, 3 of the 5 Committee members must agree.

Student Disciplinary Council:
The Student Disciplinary Council is comprised of 7 members, one faculty from each of the Colleges, and two students (one undergraduate and one graduate student) named by the President of the University. One member, elected by the Council, serves as Chair.

University Academic Integrity Committee:
The University Academic Integrity Committee is comprised of 6 members. At the beginning of the academic year, there will be 2 names (1 faculty, 1 student) from each college and one name (faculty/staff) from the Library submitted to the President’s office for appointment to the Committee. For each AI hearing, the College from which the incident arose will have both the faculty and student serve as members of this specific Committee. The remaining members of the Committee will be randomly drawn from two separate categories in order for the make-up of the Committee to be 3 faculty and 3 students. One member, elected by the Committee, will serve as Chair. An appeal to this Committee can only be based upon irregularities in procedure, new evidence not available for the first hearing, or punishment not consistent with the violation. The Committee can modify or set aside the applied sanction, refer the case back to the College Academic Integrity Committee, or uphold the decision. The decision of the University Academic Integrity Committee is final, unless the Committee determines suspension or expulsion is the appropriate sanction to be imposed.

Peer Advisor:
An accused student has the right to have another willing student act as his or her advisor/advocate and to assist the student throughout the process, beginning at Step 4 and continuing through Step 9. The student can be any presently enrolled EKU student.

Silent Advisor:
An accused student has the right to have an attorney present at any proceeding at Step 4 and continuing through Step 9. The attorney is not permitted to speak in any hearing through this process.
spacer
Student Rights and Responsibilities
University RegulationsSanctions  -Alcohol/Controlled Substances  -Visitation Violations  -Computer Violations  -Fire & Safety ViolationsStudent Judicial ProcessJudicial CommitteesStudent Handbook
 
EKU Student Rights and Responsibilities
____________________________ 521 Lancaster Avenue
Turley House 1
Richmond, KY 40475-3102
____________________________ Phone: (859) 622-1500
Fax: (859) 622-6395

Office Hours:
Mon. - Fri. 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.